Impact Of Technological Advancements On The Battle Of The...

A) Plan of Investigation: To what extent did technological advancements contribute to the victory of the Allied powers in the Battle of the Atlantic through 1939 – 1946? The Battle of the Atlantic lasted from September 1939 until the defeat of Germany in 1945; it was recalled to be the longest continuous military campaign. In the duration of six years; a glorified battle consisting of naval warfare, German U-boats, warships and Italian submarines were pitted against Allied convoys which aimed to transport military equipment and supplies across the Atlantic to Great Britain and the Soviet Union. This battle was executed to essentially gain control of Atlantic shipping routes, involved thousands of ships stretched and situated across the†¦show more content†¦Ã¯Æ' ¼ Aircrafts were very effective in protecting merchant ships; however, the problem was that Allied planes use earlier in the war did not have enough range to offer air cover or the convoys all the way across the Atlantic. The Mid-Atlantic Gap is recognized as a geographical term associated with an undefended area beyond the reach of land-based Costal Command antisubmarine aircrafts du ring the Battle of the Atlantic. Indeed this central area was known as the â€Å"Black Pit† as that was where many of the heaviest and largest convoy losses occurred. ïÆ' ¼ The introduction of the new long-range planes helped reduce the hazards of this dangerous portion of battle. Avro Lancaster was a British four-engined bomber which was implemented in warfare during the Battle of the Atlantic of the Second World War used by the Royal Air Force. It was first active as a strategic bombing offensive, and then became the main heavy bomber used by the RAF and RCAF. The Lancaster took upon the role of a long-range anti-submarine patrol aircraft and air sea rescue. It was also used as an aerial mapping resource to figure out where German U-boats most commonly attacked, hence figuring out where they usually place, with this information the Allies were able to strategically place counterattacks. The Avro Lancaster also carried passengers and delivered weapons to Britain and the Soviet Union. II. Allied scientists created many devices

Carter Company An American Manufacturer Of Children s...

Part 1. Company background Carter s, Inc., also known as the William Carter Company, is a major American manufacturer of children s apparel. William Carter was the founder of William Carter Company in 1865 in Needham, Massachusetts. The Carter family sold the business in 1990. Carter s acquired competitor OshKosh B Gosh in 2005.[Wikipedia] Carter’s designs, sources, and markets a broad array of products, primarily for sizes newborn to eight. Carter’s brand is sold in department stores, national chains, specialty stores, off-price sales channels, through Carter’s retail stores, and online at www.carters.com. Additionally, they sell Child of Mine brand at Walmart and Just One You and Precious Firsts brands at Target. The company’s strategy is to drive sales growth through focus on essential, high-volume, core apparel products for babies and young children. Company believes that their core baby and sleepwear products are essential consumer staples and less dependent on changes in fashion trends. They tier their products through marketing programs targeted toward experienced mothers, first-time mothers, and gift-givers. Company has trademarks and copyrights, including Carter’s ®, OshKosh ®, OshKosh B’gosh ®, Genuine Kids ®, Child of Mine ®, Just One You ®, Precious Firsts ®, Little Collections ®, Little Layetteâ„ ¢, Rewarding Moments ®, and Count on Carter’s ®, many of which are registered in the U.S. and in more than 140 countries and territories. Carter’s has three main competitorsShow MoreRelatedCustomer and Kohl4946 Words   |  20 Pages Prof. Fergus Rea By Kelly Charles 22 November 2010 Table of context Introduction Assignment 1.2: Course Project—Target Company Profile and Its Approach to Marketing Assignment 2.2: Course Project—Marketing Environment Analysis Assignment 3.2: Course Project— Market Segmentation Assignment 4.2: Course Project— Customer Behavior Analysis Assignment 5.2:Read MoreBackground Inditex, One of the Worlds Largest Fashion Distributors, Has Eight Major Sales Formats - Zara, Pull and Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho, Zara Home Y Kiddys Class- with 3.147 Stores in 70100262 Words   |  402 Pagesto reprint materials in this book provided that the reprint is for educational or other non-profit purposes and provided that the reprint contains a clear reference to the original material. Published in 2009 by IIIEE, Lund University, P.O. Box 196, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden, Tel: +46 – 46 222 02 00, Fax: +46 – 46 222 02 10, e-mail: iiiee@iiiee.lu.se. Printed by KFS AB, Lund. ISSN 1402-3016 ISBN 978-91-88902-46-7 Acknowledgements They say that the process of completing a PhD is a journey. For meRead MoreAdidas Marketing Plan20779 Words   |  84 PagesAdidas†©has†©been†©around†©since†©1924†©and†©has†©grown†©to†©be†©one†©of†©the†©top†©companies†©in†© providing†©a†©variety†©of†©high†©quality†©products†©to†©consumers†©interested†©in†©sports.†©It†©is†© currently†©the†©number†©two†©brand†©in†©the†©sporting†©goods†©industry,†©trailing†©its†©main†© competitor†©Nike.†©Adidas†©has†©a†©strong†©focus†©on†©both†©performance†©and†©style,†©as†©opposed†©to†© Nike’s†©more†©pure†©performance†©emphasis.†©Adidas†©is†©currently†©surviving†©in†©its†©market†©but†© has†©many†©barriers†©holding†©it†©back†©from†©becoming†©a†©more†©dominant†©and†©thriving†©company.†© †© Right†©now,†©adidas†©is†©fRead MoreAdidas Marketing Plan20768 Words   |  84 PagesAdidas†©has†©beenâ₠¬ ©around†©since†©1924†©and†©has†©grown†©to†©be†©one†©of†©the†©top†©companies†©in†© providing†©a†©variety†©of†©high†©quality†©products†©to†©consumers†©interested†©in†©sports.†©It†©is†© currently†©the†©number†©two†©brand†©in†©the†©sporting†©goods†©industry,†©trailing†©its†©main†© competitor†©Nike.†©Adidas†©has†©a†©strong†©focus†©on†©both†©performance†©and†©style,†©as†©opposed†©to†© Nike’s†©more†©pure†©performance†©emphasis.†©Adidas†©is†©currently†©surviving†©in†©its†©market†©but†© has†©many†©barriers†©holding†©it†©back†©from†©becoming†©a†©more†©dominant†©and†©thriving†©company.†© †© Right†©now,†©adidas†©is†©faRead MoreWal-Mart Case Analysis9540 Words   |  39 PagesWal-Mart had revenues of $191 billion. Wal-Mart s 2002 sales topped $218 billion, with sales growth at 13.8 %. Its 2002 net income was $ 6.7 billion, a growth of 6 %. Wal-Mart has 1,283,000 employees, as of 2002; a growth of 11.2 % (www.fortune.com). Wal-Mart is the largest retail store in the United States, and is larger than any other retail chain in the world. Currently Wal-Mart operates over 4,150 retail facilities globally. Also, the company is the dominant retail store in Canada, MexicoRead MoreThe Entrepreneurial Mind-18021 Words   |  73 Pagesorchestra conductors balancing different skills and sounds into a cohesive whole, and to top-gun pilots continually pushing the envelope of speed and daring. Whatever their passion, entrepreneurs are the heroes of today’s marketplace. They start companies and create jobs at a breathtaking pace. The global economy has been revitalized because of their efforts, and the world now embraces free enterprise as the most significant force for economic development. The passion and drive of entrepreneurs Read MoreReed Supermarket Case32354 Words   |  130 Pagespublishing, please visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk Fifth Edition GLOBAL MARKETING A DECISION-ORIENTED APPROACH Svend Hollensen Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk First published 1998 by Prentice Hall Second edition published 2001 by Pearson Education Limited Third edition published 2004 Fourth edition published 2007 Fifth editionRead MoreMarketing Management130471 Words   |  522 Pages3.1. Evolution of marketing management 3.2. The Role of Marketing 3.3. Marketing concepts 3.4. The Marketing Mix (The 4 P s Of Marketing) 3.5. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Ethics in Marketing 4. Have you understood type questions 5. Summary 6. Exercises 7. References 1. INTRODUCTION: The apex body in United States of America for the Marketing functions, American Marketing Association (AMA) defines marketing as â€Å"Marketing consists of those activities involved in the flow of goods andRead MoreStrategic Implementation of Wal Mart11391 Words   |  46 Pagesand the context. Strategic management includes the management team and possibly the Board of Directors and other stakeholders. Strategic management is an on-going process that evaluates and controls the business and the industries in which the company is involved; assesses its competitors and sets goals and strategies to meet all existing and potential competitors; and then reassesses each strategy annually or quarterly [i.e. regularly] to determine how it has been implemented and whether it hasRead MoreMarketing and Financial Markets41809 Words   |  168 Pageshelps an organization achieve its recession, marketers must develop new products, modify existing ones, and eliminate those that no longer satisfy enough buyers or that yield unacceptable profits. In the funeral home industry, for example, some companies have developed new products such as DVD memoirs, grave markers that depression photos along with a soundtrack. Features of the Book On the other hand, some luxury goods marketers are now offering lower-priced versions of their products to appeal

Old ways Free Essays

Net, wife. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to learn It will surely take time to do so. We will write a custom essay sample on Old ways or any similar topic only for you Order Now We can’t literally blame people who invented this kind of entertainment since their objective is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to it. We must have control. Like as If the government will control our time usage In vile. (repeat) Studying is not that hard, we just need to go back were there’s no Net, win. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to learn it will surely entertainment since their objective Is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to It. We must have control. Like as if the government will control our time usage in wife. Studying is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, wife. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to learn it will surely take time to do so. We can’t eternally blame people who invented this kind of entertainment since their objective Is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to it. We must have control. Like as if the government will control our time usage in wife. Studying is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, will. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But If you want to learn it will surely take time to do so. We can’t literally blame people who invented this kind of entertainment since their objective is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to it. We must have control. Like as If the government will control our time usage In will. Studying Is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, will. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to learn it will surely take time to do so. We can’t literally blame people who invented this kind of entertainment since their objective is for the great and easy way of work. It Is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to It. We must have control. Like as If the government will control our time usage in wife. Studying is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, wife. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to learn It will surely take time to do so. We can’t literally blame people who Invented this kind of entertainment since their bob]active Is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to it. We must have control. Like as if the government will control our time usage In wife. Studying is not that hard, we just need to go back were there’s no Net, will. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But If you want to learn it will surely take time to do so. We can’t literally blame people who invented not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, will. Studying old ways are 1 OFF their objective is for the great and easy way of work. It is us the people who take advantage or maybe lazy or get addicted to it. We must have control. Like as if the to go back were there’s no Net, wife. Studying old ways are more effective but time misusing. But if you want to learn it will surely take time to do so. We can’t literally blame people who invented this kind of entertainment since their objective is for the time usage in wife. Studying is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, wife. Studying old ways are more effective but time consuming. But if you want to have control. Like as if the government will control our time usage in wife. Studying is not that hard, we Just need to go back were there’s no Net, wife. Studying old ways are time usage in wife. How to cite Old ways, Papers

Comparing Federal Political Systems †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Comparing Federal Political Systems. Answer: Introduction: This is a proposal that established before the protesters express their concern through a young tribe member. They agree the acts according some options. Those are: The tribe must aware with the welfare community of the tribe. The tribes who are aware in this proposition are always making it sure that the decision always decided in all. The eldest member of the tribe always elected by a group of tribe members in the tribe for application of the duties toward the tribe people. The disputes in the tribe and any changes decision always took another separate group who are selected by the other members of the tribe. It always applicable equally for each members of the tribe. If any uncertainty arises in the rule application then they always make sure that there must be other secondary rules to establish. For avoid the social pressure this secondary rules must applied for infringement and make this adjudicate. The rule they establish are always put its effects positively and maintain obediently among the tribe members. Rules of Recognition: The famous legal philosopher Herbert Hart formed a legal principal, which establish or applied in the secondary rules. Those are the secondary rules always formed for prevent any irregularity of the primary rules. It also assists the authority of the tribe rule (Aroney and Nicholas 2015). Rules of Change: The rule always assigns with the static nature of the primary rules and upgraded. It also adds or deletes rules according the needs. The rule of recognition also contains the provisions that are similar to to rule of change. Rules of Adjudication: In rule of adjudication the mitigate inefficiency always produce empower authority bodies for determining the infringement that are related to primary rules. It also gives effects the processes, which are related, adjudicate in these issues. The process is form through the rules of adjudication, change and recognition. This is also contains the rules that prevent any fickleness into it and the secondary rules introduced for confirm the effectiveness of the primary rule. The tribe applied through the secondary rules for application of the process to upgrade or change the primary rules. This rule includes about the relief the social pressure that influences those decisions, which formed for, confirm the infringement or rules that breach. (Aroney and Nicholas 2015). For Australia, the secondary rules always introduced the legal system in the country where it puts the constitution in the country. The common law applied in Australia for the particular time as long as they not included in the Parliamentary laws. The Constitute that contains with the delegated separate powers in three parts. Those are Government legislature, executive and judiciary. The legislature always produces the power, which made the laws for using in Parliamentary laws or statutory laws. Courts have rights to make the laws and legislature that make no conflict with the statutory legislation. Here, the executive branch that was delegated use its own power for administration and apply those laws. The judiciary, which contain the court judges and the court, that uses its power to construct the laws legislated and applied through the legislature and the executive powers. Here in the case matter, the opponents who are not satisfied with the facts making decisions through the elder member of the tribe always represent partial and never present any other ways for the decision which can be changed even that is not legal and not able to give proper reason about this decision. In Australia the legal statue or system are applicable when the legislature will produce some laws that never been same for all tribe members. The executive branch always implements that how an administration should apply it perfectly. The courts or the legislation always apply the legislation and solve the disputes by involving into the statutory legislation where the decision always impartial and present the proper reasons. The law always depends on the every tribe members and the tribe rules. Superior court produces such decisions that always uses as the precedents and related with the subordinate court. The legal system in the tribe is very different from the Australia legal system in related to the certainly, recognition, enforcement and binding area of the rule. The previous decisions were not related with the tribe rules. In the legal system of tribe, the elder member who is elected by the other tribe member is always made the ultimate decisions for the tribe. The decisions he take in the legal issues are always made according the reasons related to their family. If the decision produces against the rules then the other members can ignore or reject that decision which was, produced by the elder member of the tribe. The tribe members who do not want to follow the decision never challenge that decision because that present goes against the rules. They are not entitled to challenge the decision so they sometimes make false statement about the misconduct to the elder member. At the time of making such decision, the elder member may not discuss about the decision he is willing to take . Sometimes involving the other tribe members may arise some conflict for making such decision. Australia legal system is based upon two sources, which are common law and parliamentary law. It also consists with three special act of government, which works individually. The executive powers control the administration of the law, which are introduced by the Parliament. The judiciary is controlled to establish the statues of parliament and adjudicate the legal process where the infringements arise. The doctrine of separation powers always works with the parts of the government as an individual without others liability. The executive sometimes-present laws that are needed to authorize by the parliament. The judges of this court always provide related legislation in every case where the decision is not biased and impartial to nature. The tribe who follow the legal system if alleged any crime or offence then he must punished after submitting all the evidences. Like other legal system, here also have opportunity for the offender to make their defense according the offence. However, the court only gives judgment according the statue of that particular legal system. In such matter, if any judgment does not satisfy the offender then he may appeal revision to the superior court. There are so many similarities between the tribe and Australian legal system. In both legal system the sufferers have deny the justice for the lack of the incapability of present the proper evidence in the court. The legal system, which the tribe are follow, the Australian legal system sometimes not accept those statues. The static nature of such laws cannot change, replace, reject, delete, or add because it consume so much times to process. This always manipulate the facts not involve the legislative and executive branch for implication the policies. It will beneficiary for the upper class but neglected the underprivileged (Hoyer et all. 2016). However, the difference between the legal systems has major effects in practice as independence and nature of legal rules. The executive branch applies the statutory rules formed by the legislature and judiciary is responsible for interfere the laws and confirm or punish those who overrule those laws. All branches work together but individually. Though the decisions of the courts are depends upon the people and the courts as well. The legal system in the tribe has no individual branch; the elder members of the tribe are responsible for formation the laws, administering the laws and interference the laws. Equally, the rules are not depending upon the members and victims are not depriving of justice. As per the case study, the issue is what kind of actions Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) took against Google for misleading and deceptive conduct? Is that an offence under sec-52 of the Trade Practices Act (now sec-18 of the Australian Consumer Law)? Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) made an allegation against Google for the offence of misleading or deceptive conduct according to sec-52 of the Trade Practices Act. The High Court established a judgment that Google did not liable for any misleading or deceptive conduct. The sec- 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (before sec-52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974) restrain the conduct in trade or commerce which misleading or deceptive. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 [52 of the Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth)] and Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd are some important cases that established the significance of sec 18 of the Australian Consumer Law about the advertisement business that has related in misleading and deceptive conduct. In the sec 18 of the Australian Consumer Law, this was before known as sec-52 of the Trade Practice Act 1974 is, restrain the conduct of misleading or deceptive facts. The misleading and deceptive conduct means publishing any kind of unlawful services. Any advertisement company should not provide any misleading or deceptive conducts through the advertisement that could be the reason of negative response from consumer. Google Inc is one of the leading company, which programmed free search engine named as Google. It supply the obligation to the advertiser for showing their advertisement of relevant content or their own contents which also known as AdWords. When someone typed words in Google search engine, the websites deliver of the related facts to internet users promoting the Google-partnered page where advertisement also showed. This search engine produces sponsored links, that are highlighted paid advertisement, and organic links, that are displayed free. When a Google user unlocks an organic link, he found many web pages related to that fact where the web pages links supply the sponsored link through the AdWords programming. In the case of Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013], the Australian Competition And Consumer Commission (the ACCC) brought an allegation against Google where they express that Google made an offence according sec-52 of the Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth). It is also applied into some sponsored links searches: Harvey World Travel, Honda.com.au, Alpha DogTraining and Just 4x4s Magazine. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) published that Google breach the section of 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth) because that sponsored link displayed an advertisement that contain misleading or deceptive conduct. The ACCC alleged because they thought Google was liable for the misleading or deceptive conduct where the programming software allowed adviser include the name of the sponsored link of the Advertiser Company, which was misleading or deceptive conduct. However, Google has no liability for the act because it has not allowed or not involve in misleading representations of the advertisers. The trial court describe that Google was not related in any misleading or deceptive conduct. The advertisement which was showed that was programmed by the advertises, where Google never recognized the sponsored links. So the Google programmer will not responsible for such issues. So, the ACCC appeal a revision in the the court of Federal Court. The joint judgment, which was given by the joint judges French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ Google that established Google, was not liable for any misleading or deceptive conduct. It is a online programming websites, which provide free search for producing communication between advertisers and consumer. It also related with the broadcast the advertisement through an adviser. It only provides the information according the orders of the how the user will search the information, no by the program of the Google. As per Hayne J judgment, it is described that he found that Google is customized as per the software program. It never recognized the how the advertisements present misleading conduct through any website. Heydon J delivers such facts, which provide that the ACCC had made mistakenly alleged the Google. By this, the Federal Court also made some mistakes by applying the law, which, make error as per application in law. We can see in every judgment where every judges had used judgment against ACCC. They also established facts which give information that the allegation of mislead and deceptive conducts are false. Google found innocent in this matters. However, again that court rejected ACCCs application that Google was involved in misleading or deceptive conduct. The High Court stated that Google only published the sponsored links which user searched but they never endorse them. The allegation about showing deceptive conducts is false. The High Court establish the judgment by following Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd case where they pointed that sec-52 of the Trade Practices Act that produced only particular facts as basis of general rules. Google provide only that information, which users searched. Those advertisements they showed in the web results are also provided according the users searched for (Keyes 2016). Reference Aroney, Nicholas, et al. The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia: History, Principle and Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 2015. Fras-Aceituno, Jos V., Lzaro Rodrguez-Ariza, and Isabel M. Garca-Snchez. "Is integrated reporting determined by a country's legal system? An exploratory study." Journal of Cleaner Production 44 (2013): 45-55. Ganghof, Steffen. "Is the Constitution of EqualityParliamentary, Presidential or Hybrid?." Political Studies 63.4 (2015): 814-829. Hoyer, Wayne D., Deborah J. MacInnis, and Rik Pieters. Consumer behavior. Nelson Education, 2016. Leonard, Jessica. "Aboriginal justice: The challenges of FASD and implications for the legal system." Bulletin (Law Society of South Australia) 38.1 (2016): 38. Watts, Ronald L. "Comparing Federal Political Systems." Understanding Federalism and Federation (2015): 11. "Advertising And Selling Guide | ACCC". Accc.Gov.Au, 2017, https://www.accc.gov.au/accc-book/printer-friendly/29527. Hansen, Graham. "Google Inc v Australian competition and consumer commission [2013] HCA 1: Misleading and deceptive representations."UW Austl. L. Rev.37 (2013): 153. Keyes, Mary, and Therese Wilson.Codifying Contract Law: International and Consumer Law Perspectives. Routledge, 2016. Sands, Rosanne. "Google v ACCC: The High Court Considers Misleading and Deceptive Conduct."U. Notre Dame Austl. L. Rev.15 (2013): 152. Smith, R., and Arlen Duke. "Agreements and competition law in Australia."Competition and Consumer Law Journal22 (2014): 54-79. Taylor, Des, and Noeleen McNamara. "The Australian consumer law after the first three years-is it a success?."Curtin Law and Taxation Review1.1 (2014): 96-132. Welkowitz, David S. "Trademarks and Related Rights: Highlights for 2009-10."Akron Intellectual Property Journal5.1 (2016): 3. Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013]